Occupy The Disco

Month

April 2012

59 posts

“

You ask a kid, ‘What are you doing this Saturday?’ and they’ll be playing video games or watching cable, instead of building model cars or airplanes or doing something creative. Kids today never say, ‘Man, I’m really into remote-controlled steamboats.’ They never say that.

Hey can someone point out the mythical period of history in which a large proportion of children dedicated their time to creative and intellectual endeavors? Pretty sure kids 50 years ago just played kickball and read comics. Pretty sure kids 100 years just listened I their sister play piano or whatever. Pretty sure the smart, artsy kids out there are still spending their time creating and learning. Pretty everyone else never did.

”
—

Hard to argue with Jack White on this one, via Josh Eells’ fascinating New York Times Magazine profile.  (via pitchfork)

Awwwwwwwwww ~*~*~*~*~*~* Wish we could go back to the good ol days when kids spent their Saturdays working in factories and contracting Polio

(via theremixbaby)

I mean, if we’re just going to project stuff we did or were interested in individually as kids onto an entire generation just to find newer generations wanting, I really miss the days when kids would go home and watch back-to-back episodes of Sailor Moon and Dragonball Z while drinking Huggies and walking around awkwardly in their mom’s heels. Kids today never do that.

Apr 6, 2012400 notes
Apr 6, 2012129 notes
Apr 5, 20123 notes
“

I have been taken aback by the degree to which this case has touched the nation. With more than 2,000, 000 signatures on the Change.org petition and many public figures donning hoodies on his behalf, Trayvon’s murder has the potential to galvanize national conversations about racial profiling, the criminalization of Black male bodies, and the unequal way that arrests, conviction, and sentencing are applied to Black v. non-Black persons.

But as I sat home the next day and reflected on how simple a decision it was for me to attend the March and how glad I was that I went, I thought about my more ambivalent stance toward another movement that is also central to my political commitments.

SlutWalk.

It occurred to me that there was a central point of connection between the organizing principle of the Hoodie Marches and of SlutWalk, namely that each movement has sought to dramatize the intrinsic illogic of suggesting that one’s clothing choices invite–and more to the point– justify violent treatment. Not two days after the NYC hoodie march and one day after more than 30,000 people showed up in Sanford, Fl on Trayvon’s behalf, Geraldo Rivera said on Fox News that in fact Trayvon’s hoodie has as much to do with his murder as Zimmerman’s gun.

As if.

But then all of a sudden, dudes understood. I saw FB status after FB status saying, “a hoodie is no more to blame for Trayvon’s murder than a woman’s clothing choices are to blame for rape.” I might have cheered.

But really, what I had was a larger question. Why had I, an ardent (CRUNK) feminist refused to support SlutWalk? My primary reason as I’ve said before was about the inherent white privilege signaled by a movement that wanted to “reclaim” the word “slut.” Moreover, I felt like there was simply much more at stake to ask a woman of color to come and actively identify as a slut, than was at stake for the white women who readily jumped on the bandwagon. Also, as Trayvon’s case has demonstrated, the larger issue within SlutWalk was policing. I told organizers months ago in a dialogue in our comments section, that a critique of policing would invite all kinds of folks to come to the table. Because what has become abundantly clear is that both gender and racial ideologies are deployed to constrict the rights of women and men, Black and Brown to take up public space. So my choice not to participate was an active assertion of the principle that I don’t want to be a part of any feminism that fails to actively critique racism.

Yet, I know that contemporary Black feminism emerged not just as a critique of white women’s racism, but also as a critique of Black men’s strident sexism.

In a zero-sum universe where resources are finite, and we have to pick our battles, rape/beating/harassment is (apparently) no match for state violence and murder. Within Black communities, high rates of Black male-on-Black male homicide matter more than the numbers of Black women killed at the hands of their Black male partners.

Feminist or not, it remains clear that Black women’s collective racial love affair with Black men is still going strong.

As a feminist, I personally struggle with what it means that on any given day, racism still seems to matter more to me than sexism.

I marched for Trayvon almost without a second thought; with SlutWalk, its shortcomings were enough to keep me away.

”
—

Brittney Cooper, “Why I Supported The Hoodie March And Not Slutwalk,” Crunk Feminist Collective, 4/2/12 (via racialicious)

This whole piece is really amazing and the ending especially is important.

Apr 5, 201242 notes
Beyonce has an Official Tumblr

I apologize in advance for the spam blessings from Bey my followers may be receiving.

Also this Beyhive thing is hilarious. Are they serious right now?

Apr 5, 2012
“

Disliking hip-hop doesn’t make you a racist any more than liking hip-hop makes you not a racist, and I’m sure there are plenty of Stormfront enthusiasts with Rick Ross in their iTunes. If you don’t like Jay-Z because you just don’t like the way he sounds, or you’re sick of his cloying ubiquity, or you wish he’d talk about something other than where he’s from for five seconds—hey, I’m not mad, I don’t like Bruce Springsteen for the same reasons. But if you don’t like rap music—a genre that contains multitudes—because of a self-satisfied moralism, or because you’re scared of it, or because you wish those people would stop talking about their problems and get out of your television and radio and kids’ bedrooms: well.

And I’m not just talking about the American right, I’m talking about all the well-meaning white folks who’ve told me how they want to like Lil Wayne but lo, the misogyny, the violence, the drugs. But, but, I’ll say: Bob Dylan aced misogyny; the Rolling Stones sang about violence; the Velvet Underground knew their way around some drugs. Yeeeah, but it’s different, they’ll say, elongating that “yeah” with conspiratorial inflection: you know what I mean. Yeah, I know exactly what you mean.

Rap music doesn’t get unarmed kids shot to death, “it’s different” does. “It’s different” infuses “these assholes always get away” and gives solace to people who hear that sound bite and nod their empty heads in agreement. “It’s different” is the same logic that suggests a teenager’s skin color combined with the music he listened to means he had it coming, and it’s the same logic that lets a bunch of people feign outrage over a teenager’s use of the n-word to describe himself when they’re really just outraged that he beat them to the punch.

“It’s different” makes me shake with anger because it turns music into a dog-whistle to justify the murder of a kid who doesn’t seem all that “different” from me was when I was his age, not that different at all. I liked Skittles and hoodies and weed, too. And yeah, I’m white and never worried about getting shot for any of it, which is only the most loathsome excuse for not identifying with someone that I can possibly think of.

”
—Jack Hamilton, “America Is Dying Slowly: Talking About Hip-Hop After Trayvon Martin” (Good)
Apr 5, 20125,583 notes
“‘Friendzoning’ is bullshit because girls are not machines that you put Kindness Coins into until sex falls out.” —

—@mediocreventure, via Twitter

(via racialicious)

Apr 5, 20121,724 notes
Apr 3, 201230,293 notes
Apr 2, 2012730 notes

March 2012

88 posts

Mar 30, 20126,990 notes
Mar 29, 20122 notes
Hold Me Back A*M*E

A*M*E—Hold Me Back

I’m actually looking forward to more from her. I’m finding mediocre quality videso of her performing live that are quite good.

Mar 28, 20123 notes
#a*m*e #music #pop
katherine st asaph: heronqueenblues: I’m trying to figure

heronqueenblues:

I’m trying to figure out a way to phrase this, but I can’t get the right words

but the gist is that in music press I so often see shock when black musicians (usually involved with hip hop) reference or collaborate with “high brow” artists, and in a similar vein I see so many references to “accidental genius” when talking about hip hop albums

it’s this weird thing where it’s assumed poor people (poor black people, to be more specific) aren’t aware of high art, aren’t interested in it, and don’t know how to create work of an equal stature and equal complexity

like, as an example, whenever Wu-Tang Clan is discussed, in solo or group guises, there always seems to be an unspoken undertone of “wow, these black guys somehow made really powerful, well-crafted, important art! how weird! they sure lucked out/ they’ve must just have an ear for it”, as if when Ghostface sat down and made Supreme Clientele he didn’t think about how the themes fit together, how the tracklist should be ordered to emphasize those themes, how the samples he chose and the atmosphere of the tracks worked with his lyrics

it’s just assumed it “came naturally” to him or something, as if the only way black artists can create something powerful is through instinct, thought and consideration and craftsmanship never brought into the equation

I think that’s why it bothers me so much when people detest violence in rap lyrics, but defend violence in other art. they’re basically saying, “these white artists were just playing a character, writing an interesting scene; it’s not meant to be taken literally. these black kids, however, aren’t smart enough to do that, so it obviously must be literal; there’s obviously no subtext/they’re not smart enough to use violence in an artistic way”

this is probably a bit rambly but it’s a big problem I see to varying degrees when rap music is discussed critically and it’s always bothered me.

Mar 28, 2012865 notes
“Yes: it was the hoodie’s fault. A hooded sweatshirt can make an innocent teen look like a criminal — just like a suit and glasses can make Geraldo Rivera look like a journalist.” —

STEPHEN COLBERT, on Fox “News” contributor Geraldo Rivera’s contention that wearing a hoodie is what led to Trayvon Martin’s murder, on The Colbert Report (via inothernews)

BUUUUUUURN.

(via blacknerdjade)

I was DONE when he said this.

(via babyboygreen)

Mar 27, 20124,204 notes
Yes .... He's BLACK, Don'cha Know! So, Let's Raise ALL The Racist Stereotypes To Bring Doubt! → thinkprogress.org

phroyd:

What Everyone Needs To Know About The Smear Campaign Against Trayvon Martin (1995-2012)

Over the last 48 hours, there has been a sustained effort to smear Trayvon Martin, the 17-year old African-American who was shot dead by George Zimmerman a month ago. Martin’s mother, Sybrina Fulton, said, “They killed my son, now they’re trying to kill his reputation.”

Thus far these attacks have fallen into two categories: false and irrelevant. Much of this leaked information seems intended to play into stereotypes about young African-American males. Here’s what everyone should know:

1. Prominent conservative websites published fake photos of Martin. Twitchy, a new website run by prominent conservative blogger Michelle Malkin, promoted a photo — purportedly from Martin’s Facebook page — that shows Martin in saggy pants and flipping the bird. The photo, which spread quickly on conservative websites and Twitter, is intended to paint Martin as a thug. As Twitchy later acknowledged, it is not a photo of Trayvon Martin. [Examiner]

2. The Sanford Police selectively leaked irrelevant, negative information about Martin. The authorities told the Orlando Sentinel this morning that Trayvon was suspended from school for ten days “after being found with an empty marijuana baggie.” There is no evidence that Martin was under the influence of drugs at the time of his death, nor would prior possession of marijuana be a reason for killing him. It’s unclear what the relevance of the leak was, other than to smear Martin. [Orlando Sentinel]

3. On Fox News, Geraldo said that Martin was dressed “like a wannabe gangster.” Bill O’Reilly agreed with him. The sole evidence is that Martin was wearing a hoodie. Geraldo added that “everyone that ever stuck up a convenience store” was wearing a hoodie. [ThinkProgress; The Blaze]

4. Without any evidence, prominent right-wing bloggers suggested that Martin was a drug dealer. Right-wing blogger Dan Riehl advances the theory, also advanced in a widely linked peice on a site called Wagist. There does not appear to be any evidence to support this claim whatsoever. [Riehl World View]

5. Without any evidence, a right-wing columnist alleged that Martin assaulted a bus driver. Unlike Zimmerman, Trayvon has no documented history of violence. This allegation continues to be advanced by a blogger on the Examiner even after the real reason was leaked to the police and confirmed by the family. [Miami Herald; Examiner]

6. Zimmerman’s friend says Martin was to blame because he was disrespectful to Zimmerman. Zimmerman’s friend Joe Oliver said that Martin would not have been shot to death if Trayvon had just said “I’m staying with my parents.” Of course, Zimmerman was not a police officer, and Trayvon had no duty to tell him who he was or where he was going. [NBC News]

The final part of the effort to smear Trayvon Martin is to link him and his supporters to irresponsible fringe groups like the New Black Panthers and marignal provocateurs like Louis Farrakhan. Threats by these groups are serious and should be investigated, but they have nothing to do with Martin or his supporters. The leader of the effort to associate Martin with these groups is Matt Drudge. 

Mar 26, 2012640 notes
Mar 26, 2012960 notes
Arousal, consent, and Mad Men

screwrocknroll:

More Don Draper reax. First, Erin:

Jonathan’s mentioned it – unsurprising, since we had a long chat about it last night after the show – but I was deeply uncomfortable with Don Draper’s (for want of a better term) rapeyness in last night’s Mad Men episode.

Just as after he sexually assaulted Bobbie Barrett in Season 2, the “but she clearly enjoyed it” is being used as a justification for his behavior. That somehow sexual assault isn’t sexual assault if the parties engage in consensual sex afterwards.  

I understand that sexuality is fluid, personal, and complicated.  I understand that people have a variety of sexual relationships and understanding.  But I think it’s really, really important to either establish that.  Because without it, the line between consensual sex and rape becomes more complicated.

Megan Draper clearly and audibly said no.  At no point, before Don forced himself on her, did she retract that.  The fact that the sex was ultimately pleasurable does not negate the fact he made the decision to ignore her no, assuming her desire for him would overpower her objections.  

Here’s the thing: No means no. Pleasure is not consent. Arousal is not consent. Submission is not consent. “She enjoyed it” is NOT an excuse. 

Perhaps it wouldn’t seem as bad if this were an isolated incident, but the show has a history of not really understanding rape and sexual assault.  Both Vincent Kartheizer and Matthew Weiner defended Pete Campbell after he raped a neighbour’s nanny, saying it wasn’t rape.  Saying that “she kissed him back”, so the clear rejection and refusal was erased.  

That’s just wrong.

Pete Campbell is a rapist. Don Draper has a history of sexual assault and we should be talking about last night’s episode in that light. And if the Mad Men writers don’t like people thinking about Don like that, they should remember that arousal is not the same as consent. 

Also, Erin specifically in reply to my post:

She did resist, though. She clearly and audibly said no. When we start getting into the “no means no, except when the man knows she secretly wants it, we’re on a very slippery slope, to say the least.

Trish, reblogging my post:

When Peggy told Don that she thought Megan wanted to be alone he said “You don’t know her at all” and when he gets home he isn’t treading carefully, like he might if he genuinely didn’t know what was going on, he shouts for her and she comes out in a robe. It feels like this is something that has occurred a few times, and this is how they deal with their conflicts. Whether it’s a good way of doing it or not is a different story.

And Martin:

I think part of it is from Don knowing she wouldn’t resist. It seems like a lot of his sexual identity is based on narcissism, like the fact that women can’t resist him is what arouses him, far more than the women themselves

Martin’s part is so on point, as is Erin’s.

Mar 26, 201219 notes
  • When POC characters are turned white: this isin't about race, if you think it is then you're the racist one, lets just enjoy the book/film as it is, this is about the character's personality god you're so sensitive, the new skin tone actually fits the character's personality IMO, I never imagined them as POC anyway, not all whitewashing is racist god get over it!!111
  • When white characters are turned into POC: omg how could they!?!?!? this is soooo racist and unfair! why cant they present that white character as WHITE, how dare they change the original skin color to suit their own terms! this is reverse racism!! this is about race! I NEVER imaged that white character to be a POC that is so weird, it doesn't fit, this is political correctness gone crazy!!
Mar 26, 20124,801 notes
Really Though?

I’m gonna need all my fellow black people who honestly buy into this whole “this is a black guy vs. this is a nigger” nonsense to miss me with that shit.

Now, I’m not saying that black respectability politics are a blatant attempt by black elites to ingratiate themselves to whiteness and white people by throwing other black folks under the bus, but when you make a macro image and use Uncle TomMorgan Freeman as the example of black respectability…

Mar 26, 2012
#no love #from under the bus #morgan freeman
Mar 25, 20129,414 notes
Next page →
2012 2013
  • January 131
  • February 100
  • March 79
  • April 94
  • May 122
  • June 57
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012 2013
  • January 81
  • February 112
  • March 88
  • April 59
  • May 80
  • June 117
  • July 121
  • August 133
  • September 114
  • October 128
  • November 122
  • December 121
2011 2012
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November 36
  • December 45